Tải bản đầy đủ - 0trang
"Where the Split Began" (Prometheus Unbound, Act III)
"Where the Split Began"
The Rape of Thetis (Scene i)
Shelley devotes only fifty-one lines to conjuring up for his readers some image
of what Jupiter's "Heaven" has been like through the millennia. The first,
perhaps most hellish, thing about it is that its ruler is a monologist. A large
cast, made up of "Thetis and other Deities," is assembled, but they are props,
extras; not one has a line of dialogue. Addressed as "Powers," they function
only as vehicles for Jupiter's own power, a process he calls "sharing" (III.i.1).
In contrast "the soul of man," described in a Promethean simile as "like
unextinguished fire" (III.i.5), resists such total assimilation, though in a confused and still ineffectual way. With an interestingly Blakean turn, Jupiter
describes the source of his ages-long strength as "eldest faith, and Hell's coeval,
fear" (III.i. 10)—that is, as the process, described by Hogle (89ff.), by which
humans alienate their own powers through the concept of an all-powerful
Other, empty themselves as the "Powers" of heaven have been emptied, and
then live in subservient fear of their own false creation. So the "Father in
Heaven" conceived through this "eldest faith" is actually Lord of Hell. As with
Dante's Satan and Blake's Urizen, his malevolence expresses itself in images
not of fire but of cold: "And though my curses through the pendulous air / Like
snow on herbless peaks, fall flake by flake/And cling to it [the soul of man] . . .
/ It yet remains supreme o'er misery" (III.i.11-13, 16).
As Reiman and Powers point out (SPP 180), Jupiter's image of snow piling
up "flake by flake" on mountain peaks to describe his gathering power ironically echoes Asia's words on the process by which just perception builds
"flake after flake, in Heaven-defying minds / As thought by thought is piled"
(II.iii.39-40) and so looks forward to the avalanche of changed perception
about to sweep Jupiter down into the abyss. But on its own terms the image
also shows the action whereby Jupiterean discourse blanks out all signification
except its own. Functioning as the discourse of all those political, religious,
legal, and social agencies that serve as conduits of Jupiterean power, its purpose is to make that power seem an inescapable given, certainly, but also,
ideally, to make it an acceptable good. Jupiter's snow, in brief, is the blanketing ideology that Shelley describes in "A Philosophical View of Reform": "It
is in vain to exhort us to wait until all men shall desire Freedom whose real
interest will consist in its establishment. It is in vain to hope to enlighten them
whilst their tyrants employ the utmost artifices of all their complicated engine
to perpetuate the infection of every species of fanaticism & error from generation to generation." Its soft and constant fall obliterates all the boundaries
between separate subjectivities: "Unless the cause which renders them passive
subjects instead of active citizens be removed, they will sink with accelerated
gradations into that barbaric & unnatural civilization which destroys all differences among men" (SHC VI, 1056).
From Jupiter's own admission, an "unextinguish'd fire" in the "soul of
man" (III.i.5) has so far prevented that merging of subjectivity into an undifferentiated mass. That fire is Promethean, of course, but also—in the moun-
Re-Membering the Mother
tain landscape described by Jupiter's extended simile—the allusion conjures
up the figure of Demogorgon. Given my adaptation and extension of Matthews's argument so as to link Demogorgon with both repressed sexuality and
the spirit of revolution, the "unextinguish'd fire" therefore has sexuality as
part of its fuel. Indeed, there is evidence to suggest that Shelley, making an
identification that Foucault has shown to be axiomatic by the early nineteenth
century (History of Sexuality I, 155-56), takes sexuality to be definitive in the
structuring of a sense of individual identity.
A marshaling of this evidence must begin with Jupiter's gloating over a
"fatal Child," product of his union with Thetis, who will finally smother the
unextinguished fire burning on despite the Jupiterean reign of ice and snow:
Even now have I begotten a strange wonder,
That fatal Child, the terror of the Earth,
Who waits but till the destined Hour arrive,
Bearing from Demogorgon's vacant throne
The dreadful might of ever living limbs
Which clothed that awful spirit unbeheld—
To redescend and trample out the spark . . .
Again, as in the echo of Asia's words "flake on flake," the passage is heavily
ironic in that the forthcoming event in no way resembles Jupiter's anticipation
of it. Jupiter's own, unironic message also deserves—and has received—
scholarly attention, notably from Pulos, who suggests that the "Child" on
whom Jupiter rests his hope for total possession of the human spirit "may
quite possibly be a symbol for Malthusianism" ("Shelley and Malthus" 120).
With clarity and sweet reason Malthus sets forth his foundational principle: "Population, when unchecked, increases in a geometrical ratio. Subsistence increases only in an arithmetical ratio" (9). The "checks" to population
explosion are moral restraint, vice, and misery. Of these the negative ones,
vice and misery, take their greatest toll among the poor, whose marginal
resources make them most vulnerable when the population level becomes
disproportionate to the food supply. It is therefore particularly incumbent on
the poor—a matter for them of special "Necessity" within this mathematical
schema—to use the "positive" check of moral restraint and/or sexual abstinence: to practice continence before marriage, to marry late, and to observe
prolonged periods of abstinence in marriage.
Shelley's diatribe against Malthus in "A Philosophical View of Reform"
(where, unnamed, he is characterized as "a priest of course—for his doctrines
are those of a eunuch & of a tyrant" [SHC VI, 1023]) focuses on these
Malthusian dicta against sexual expression among the poor. In its inclusion of
all domestic bonds within the sexual, Shelley's description of sexuality as "the
single alleviation of their sufferings & their scorns, the one thing which made
it impossible to degrade them below the beasts" actually resembles Eagleton's
"aesthetic." Shelley makes sexuality the very core of identity, "the last tie by
which Nature holds them [the poor] to the benignant earth" and connects it
"Where the Split Began"
also with those qualities the maternal ideology placed within the purview of
the feminine: "all the soothing elevating & harmonious gentlenesses of the
sexual intercourse, & the humanizing charities of domestic life which are its
appendandages" [sic] (SHC VI, 1024). The vehemence of his indignation
stems from a proto-Foucauldian insight that the whole area with which the
uniqueness of each individual seems most identified can actually be the site of
its deepest inscription. The volatility of Demogorgon, however, serves as
dramatic parallel to Eagleton's assertion that "the aesthetic as custom, sentiment, spontaneous impulse may consort well enough with political domination; but these phenomena border embarrassingly on passion, imagination,
sensuality, which are not always so easily incorporable" (28).
In annotating the text of "A Philosophical View," Reiman feels bound in
fairness to point out that Malthus "though a priest was hardly a eunuch (he
sired a son and two daughters) or a tyrant" (SHC VI, 1023). But read again in
the context of act three, scene one of Prometheus Unbound, the epithets take
on particular doubled significance. As an instrument of Jupiter (i.e., of the
hegemonic power structure) Malthus, emptied of sexual desire himself and
thereby a "passive subject" rather than an "active citizen," advises that others
be likewise emptied; he is in that capacity a eunuch and a propagandist or
sycophant. As the image or microcosm of Jupiter, he is, for reasons to be
discussed next, a rapist and a tyrant.
Rape functions in this scene as both metaphor and metonym for Jupiter's
tyrannical inscription of vulnerable mirroring subjectivity. The narrated rape
of Thetis constitutes the only action in the scene besides that of Jupiter's fall
and serves to characterize his whole reign. In a use of ventriloquism as
charged with meaning as that in act one when the shade of Jupiter repeats
Prometheus' curse, but with a very different dramatic purpose, Shelley has
Jupiter so totally appropriate Thetis' speech that the account of the rape is his
alone, and her very cry of protest becomes a vehicle for his expression of
sadistic pleasure. Through the passage reverberate other versions of a similar
event; Jupiter's words comment ironically on Hesiod's admiration for Zeus'
cunning in swallowing Metis (Hesiod 143) and on Zeus' infiltration of lo's
dreaming mind in Prometheus Bound (11. 949-68):
Ascend beside me, veiled in the light
Of the desire which makes thee one with me,
Thetis, bright Image of Eternity!—
When thou didst cry, "Insufferable might!
God! spare me! I sustain not the quick flames,
The penetrating presence; all my being,
Like him whom the Numidian seps did thaw
Into a dew with poison, is dissolved,
Sinking through its foundations"—
The intertexuality of these lines involves not only classical allusions but
thematic connections with two works that Shelley was soon to write, The
Re-Membering the Mother
Cenci and "On Life." The relevant passage from "On Life" is the meditation
on the nature of pronouns that have been considered before in other contexts: "The existence of distinct individual minds . . . is likewise found to be
a delusion. The words, /, you, they, are not signs of any actual difference
subsisting between the assemblage of thoughts thus indicated, but are merely
marks employed to denote the different modifications of the one mind"
(SPP 477-78). The perceiving mind is not a Lockean, separate, bourgeois
entity cheerfully gathering, filing, and storing impressions. Perceptions invade mind so that one becomes what one experiences. We have acquired
signifiers for the process—"introjection," "colonization"—unavailable to
Shelley, but his "thread of reasoning" has brought him to the concept.
Now, as Shelley's use of the word "eunuch" to characterize Malthus and as
the ravaged body of Prometheus both show, a male subject's castration could
represent human vulnerability to impression at least as well as a female subject's rape. Both in this scene of Prometheus Unbound and in The Cenci,
however, Shelley veils and displaces the horror of castration, substituting for
it the rape of a powerless and virtuous woman by a syphilitic patriarch whose
purpose is to permeate and disease her body while making her mind a mirror
and receptacle of his own. That is, like most men of his time and on up to our
time, Shelley drew back from imagining psychic vulnerability as universal,
preferring to accept guilt for a male sexuality constructed as violent and
intrusive if it were also both signifier for and guarantor of impermeable autonomy. The split in the Eagleton passage quoted at the beginning of this chapter
between the "lonely autonomy" of "individuals" on the one hand and "exchange or appropriation" among subjectivities on the other is elided by the
gendering of one as male, the other as female.
The lines with which Jupiter first addresses Thetis mildly foreshadow the
more violent mirroring to come. He moves quickly from satisfaction with
Thetis as his mirror to exhibitionist pleasure in using her words of protest to
reveal his potency. Central to Thetis' quoted speech, and proof that hers is not
an orgasmic cry in any positive sense, is the allusion to a grotesquely horrible
incident in Lucan's Pharsalia (IX.762-88) in which Sabellus is bitten by a
seps. The poison of this serpent dissolves bone itself, reducing his body to a
revolting jelly. The image thus carries the thought that syphilitic Jupiter
(Crook and Guiton 188) is a universal source of contagion; his mirror in world
history is the diseased Count Cenci, who says of his incestuous rape of his
daughter, Beatrice, "I will make / Body and soul a monstrous lump of ruin"
([SPP] Cenci IV.i.94-95).
A similar echo of Thetis' cry appears in Beatrice's maddened screams after
her rape. She comes on stage suffering the delusion that blood is pouring into
her eyes. The next sensations she describes are schizophrenic: one "self"
stands watching, while another experiences a sickening, giddy dissolution.
Further images of blood follow, and then (the two selves collapsing into one)
evocations of loathsome smells. The most intimate of the senses, smell invades the body even more than hearing does. As image of that penetration
"Where the Split Began"
Shelley has these smells assume a visible form in a "clinging, black, contaminating mist" that "glues / My fingers and my limbs to one another, / And eats
into my sinews, and dissolves / My flesh to a pollution" (III.i.17-22).
For both Thetis and Beatrice this sense of physical dissolution serves
merely as trope for a more appalling fear that subjectivity itself now permanently includes the "penetrating presence" of the rapist Other. This, a horrible but parallel version of Jupiter's plan to make Thetis "one" with himself, is
the ultimate suffering that Cenci intends to inflict on his daughter: "She shall
become (for what she most abhors / Shall have a fascination to entrap / Her
loathing will), to her own conscious self/ All she appears to others" (IV.i.8588). And Cenci almost succeeds. Condemned to die for having murdered him,
Beatrice quails before the possibility that after death there will be no God and
no Heaven but no oblivion either:
If all things then should be ... my father's spirit
His eyes, his voice, his touch surrounding me;
The atmosphere and breath of my dead life!
If sometimes, as a shape more like himself,
Even the form which tortured me on earth,
Masked in grey hairs and wrinkles, he should come
And wind me in his hellish arms, and fix
His eyes on mine, and drag me down, down, down!
For was he not alone omnipotent
On Earth, and ever present?
The fantasy is by no means irrational but, as I have noted, shows a psychologically astute understanding of the fluid nature of subjectivity. Beatrice's
stepmother, the loving but ineffectual Lucretia, offers an escape from it
through trust in "the tender promises of Christ" and the hope of attaining
Paradise. But Shelley's Beatrice can take no comfort from Lucretia's words:
"You do well telling me to trust in God, / 1 hope I do trust in him, In whom
else / Can any trust?" (V.iv.87-89). All the action of the play suggests that the
answer to her rhetorical question is "in no one—including God." One might
even say "especially not in God," since, as Curran points out, "the paternal
power in this play is almost mystical, a direct reflection of God's authority and
the Pope's" (Shelley's "Cenci" 67), and all three are manifestations of the
paternal power called Jupiter in Prometheus Unbound.
The "sad reality" (SPP 237) of the historically based Cenci contrasts
sharply with the mythic and Utopian Prometheus Unbound. In the one, having
characterized "revenge, retaliation, atonement" as "pernicious mistakes"
(SPP 240), Shelley dramatizes a situation in which Beatrice's only recourse in
the face of subjective dissolution is murder. No Demogorgon rises to her
rescue. Indeed, the murder of Cenci itself does not offer a resolution, since it
leaves her still in danger of possession by her father's spirit. Only acceptance
of death as reunion with the mother exorcises that paternal spirit and makes it
possible for Beatrice to die bravely (V.iv. 115-18). As I shall shortly discuss,
Re-Membering the Mother
relationship with the mother is of similarly crucial significance in Prometheus
Also, if one puts aside the kind of response to patriarchal appropriation of
subjectivity available to the protagonists in the two plays and focuses rather
on that appropriation itself, one can see a parallel between the myth and its
reflection in history. Both Prometheus Unbound and The Cenci suggest that
the patriarchal assault on subjectivity that seeks finally to appropriate sexuality itself acts as "the last straw" in the cliche, the last snowflake in Shelley's
metaphor, which overwhelms Cenci in death, Jupiter in the downfall created
by the appearance of Demogorgon.
Crook and Guiton, building on Matthews's association of Demogorgon
with the many-headed rebel giant Typhon and on Pulos's theory that the
Malthusian fatal Child envisioned by Jupiter turns out to be his doom, offer an
interpretation of the conclusion of act three, scene one of Prometheus Unbound that I find convincing though incomplete: "Demogorgon can therefore
be identified with the force of the proletariat, irresistible because of its
'unvanquishable number' once roused from sleep. The increase in population,
held by Malthus to be the reason for keeping the masses in perpetual subservience, is the very means of their self-deliverance" (196).
While true to the political aspect of Shelley's thought, signaled through its
applicability to The Mask of Anarchy, this reading does not address the
closely related problems centered on subjectivity and language. Nor do gender politics enter into it. As prelude to a later consideration of all these, we
need to hear one further echo in Thetis' reported speech: the fate of Semele.
Like lo, Semele had the misfortune to arouse the ardor of Zeus and the
consequent jealousy of Hera. Taking the form of Semele's nurse, Hera persuaded the young woman to ask Zeus, as the favor he had promised, that he
come to her in the full panoply of his godhead; doing so, he consumed her by
fire. Dionysus, the infant she had conceived, was saved from the fire and
carried in Zeus' thigh until he was mature enough to be born.
The evocation of Semele in the line "God! spare me! I sustain not the
quick flames" (III.i.39), coupled with Demogorgon's statement to Jupiter "I
am thy child, as thou wert Saturn's child" (III.i.54), elides Demogorgon with
Dionysus. Abstractly or allegorically described, the process by which Jupiter
produces Demogorgon involves a Jupiterean overreaching that attempts the
final takeover of the unity in which "each is at once the centre and the
circumference" ("On Life," SPP 476). The attempt to infiltrate that unity to
its depths finds in those depths its nemesis. For the "unity" is in fact a mysteriously shared life—Dionysian, not Jupiterean. Again, a statement of Eagleton's offers a useful gloss: " 'Deep' subjectivity is just what the ruling social
order desires, and exactly what it has most cause to fear. If the aesthetic is a
dangerous, ambiguous affair, it is because . . . there is something in the body
which can revolt against the power which inscribes it; and that impulse could
only be eradicated by extirpating along with it the capacity to authenticate
power itself" (28).
"Where the Split Began"
Utopian Paradigms (Scene n)
Scenes three and four of act three further explore the nature of this unity, and
I shall discuss the topic at length, pausing only to consider before that what
purpose scene two serves in the drama. In brief I would say that its principal
function is its pastoral form. Structurally, this scene balances act two, scene
two, thereby picking up a pastoral motif expressive of the determination to
achieve an art that "leads man who cannot now go back to Arcady forward to
Elysium" (Schiller, Naive and Sentimental Poetry 153), a purpose that will
dominate the drama from this point on. At least complicating, if not hampering, this linear trajectory, however, is the pastoral's tendency toward a regressive or a cyclic vision. Both these complicating tendencies are given particular
opportunity to flourish by the scene's setting: "The Mouth of a great River in
the Island Atlantis."
As was true in the "forest" scene of act two, scene two, a book-lined
study is more truly the locus of the action than the river mouth, and our eyes
lift to scan texts by Plato and Bacon on the surrounding shelves. The story of
an ancient and powerful civilization centered on the island of Atlantis somewhere west of the Pillars of Hercules appears first in the Platonic dialogues
Timaeus and Critias. The Timaeus contrasts luxurious, commercial, slaveholding Atlantis (much resembling Plato's contemporary Athens) with an
equitable and moderate Athens of an earlier period. But in Critias we learn
that at one time the power-mad Atlantans also "bore the burden of their
wealth and possessions lightly, and did not let their high standard of living . . . make them lose their self-control" (145). Similarly, in Bacon's New
Atlantis the admirable people of the island of Bensalem, while expert mariners, "maintain a trade, not for gold, silver, or jewels; nor for silks; nor for
spices; nor for any other commodity of matter; but only for God's first
creature, which was Light: to have light... of the growth of all parts of the
Critias takes up the subject of Athens and Atlantis once again, beginning
with a description of Athens in prehistoric times:
Once upon a time the gods divided up the Earth between them—not in the
course of a quarrel. . . . Each gladly received his just allocation, and settled
his territories; and having done so they proceeded to look after us, their
creatures and children, as shepherds look after their flocks. They did not use
physical means of control, like shepherds who direct their flock with blows,
but brought their influence to bear on the creature's most sensitive part,
using persuasion as a steersman uses the helm to direct the mind as they saw
fit and so guide the whole mortal creature. (131-32)
With elegant allusion to his precedent masters in the Utopian, Shelley
takes up these ideas and images while adding touches of his own. as he has
Re-Membering the Mother
and from their glassy thrones
Blue Proteus and his humid nymphs shall mark
The shadow of fair ships, as mortals see
The floating bark of the light-laden moon
With that white star, its sightless pilot's crest,
Borne down the rapid sunset's ebbing sea;
Tracking their path no more by blood and groans;
And desolation and the mingled voice
Of slavery and command—but by the light
Of wave-reflected flowers, and floating odours.
And music soft, and mild, free, gentle voices,
That sweetest music, such as spirits love.
(III. ii. 23-34)
An extended simile structures the passage: Proteus and his nymphs "marking" the humans' ships that sail above them are compared to human beings
noting the "light-laden" moon ship—the crescent moon of the cow-goddess
Hathor/Isis bearing the outlined full moon—piloted by the planet Venus. In
addition to setting up this parallel, however, the phrase "as mortals see,"
through the breadth of the term "mortals," shifts the image so that the particular ship noted by Proteus changes into Earth as a spaceship mirroring the
moon ship, both piloted by a Venus that as light source needs no sight, being
the transcendent focus for all other sight.
The synonym "note" that I have used for "mark" seems adequate until one
comes to Shelley's own synonym "tracking," which carries the suggestion that
Proteus and his nymphs also have the function of pilots, though unheeded
ones in the times just past. The passage thus places the world within a circle of
care that extends from the sea's depths up through the heavens. In that circle
the former language in which "mirroring" inscribes the slave disappears. In its
place is a synesthetic language of difference mingling into harmony, "flowers," "odours," "music," and "voices" all blending in a "light" that mirrors the
light of the "white star," Venus.
Another Platonic text in which the gods of a former age are compared to
shepherds calls for attention because it bears on the significance not only of
this scene but also of the one to follow. The description of life in the age of
Kronos as it appears in Plato's Statesman is one that Jane Harrison describes
as "haunted by reminiscences . . . of matrilinear social structure" (Themis
496). Its appeal to someone as imbued as Shelley was with the Godwinian
form of "anarchy" is also obvious:
When God was Shepherd there were no political constitutions and no taking
of wives and begetting of children. For all men rose up anew into life out of
earth, having no memory of former things. Instead they had fruits without
stint from trees and bushes; these needed no cultivation but sprang up of
themselves out of the ground without man's toil. For the most part they
disported themselves in the open needing neither clothing nor couch, for the
seasons were blended evenly so as to work them no hurt, and the grass which
sprang up out of the earth in abundance made a soft bed for them. (150)
"Where the Split Began"
The "Stranger" who gives Socrates and his followers this account concludes it
by asking, with heavy irony, "Our present life—said to be under the government of Zeus—you are alive to experience for yourself," and adds: "But
which of these makes for greater happiness do you think? Can you give a
verdict?" (150). Shelley's challenge as he begins writing scene three is to
answer the same questions. He has to make an imagined return to innocence
something other than a regression. He also has a problem inherited from his
Platonic cyclical model: Is the renewal of human life the start of what eventually will be a repetition?
Mother and Son (Scene iii)
The climactic scene in Prometheus Unbound, in that it depicts the very moment of "unbinding," gets off to an awkwardly anticlimactic start. Aeschylus
gives eighty-five emotion-packed lines as accompaniment to the "stage business" during which Hephaestus, along with Power and Force, labors over the
binding of Prometheus. But the unbinding by Hercules in Shelley's play is
performed without a word, and Hercules' opening comment on the feat he has
performed seems formulaic: "Thus doth strength / To wisdom, courage, and
long suffering love, / And thee, who art the form they animate, / Minister, like
a slave" (III.iii.1-4). Still, the contrast between Hercules' attitude here as
personified Strength and that of Power and Force in Prometheus Bound does
help recall the Aeschylean trilogy, as do the stage presences of Hercules and
Earth. Appropriately so, for the drama of the scene inheres not in the actions
performed on stage so much as in Shelley's situation as a dramatist. The
moment has come to transform the Aeschylean "catastrophe" into the vision
of a new world order. What will it be?
"It" is essentially two long speeches, one by Prometheus describing a
"Cave" (III.iii. 10) where he with Asia, Panthea, and lone will live without
parting; the other by Earth describing a "Cavern" (III.iii. 124), which she
also calls a "Cave," beside a "Temple" (III.iii. 175). These allusions create an
interpretive crux: Are these two different caves or descriptions of the same
one? And whichever way that question is answered—whether this odd quartet, Prometheus and the three Oceanides, is imagined as stay-at-homes in a
single cave or as leisured gentry with the diversion of travel between two—
there arises the more serious difficulty that the Promethean agon seems to
be resolving itself into an eternity of boredom. Dramatically that judgment
has to be correct. The excitement charging this crucial scene is not dramatic
but altogether lyric: it turns upon the significance to be read into descriptions of the cave(s), and the mixture there of aesthetic and erotic pleasure
that was the consolation offered Prometheus in the fourth Spirit's song of act
one: feeding "on the aerial kisses / Of shapes that haunt thought's wildernesses" (I.i.741-42).
Prometheus' opening address to Asia after their millennia-long separation
scarcely bears out my contention that an erotic dynamism crackles through
Re-Membering the Mother
the language of this scene. True, the two epithets he uses for Asia—"Thou
light of life, / Shadow of beauty unbeheld" (III.iii.6-7)—recall with exquisite
succinctness the epiphanic moment in which her unveiled presence becomes
the veil or atmosphere for the sunlike fire of love "filling the living world"
(II.v.26-27) and its return as herald of Prometheus' release. Nonetheless,
Prometheus does not address as much as a full sentence to Asia but links her
instantly to the "fair sister nymphs" whose love and care were so long his only
comfort. The form of his address makes it clear that the promise "Henceforth
we will not part" firmly includes Panthea and lone as part of the household
(III.iii.8-10). Drama's generically necessary reifications create some of this
awkwardness. As triune aspects of the introjected feminine—specifically, relation through the maternal to body, to language, and to feeling—all three
Oceanides belong with a Prometheus healed of inner divisions. Also, Asia's
task as reverie, as the memory trace of relationship with the mother, is completed once the memory itself is activated, once Prometheus gets "back of the
Muses" to Mnemosyne herself (Duncan 27). This culminating event is about
to occur through Prometheus' reunion with Earth.1
Rationally, if not romantically, Prometheus' first concern is a dwelling for
his menage, and his opening words on the subject—"There is a Cave"—
should be "heard" on the mind-stage of this closet drama as somewhat tentative and reminiscent in tone, but growing more assured as the recollection of
physical details recreates a past experience of happiness:
There is a Cave
All overgrown with trailing odorous plants
Which curtain out the day with leaves and flowers
And paved with veined emerald, and a fountain
Leaps in the midst with an awakening sound;
From its curved roof the mountain's frozen tears
Like snow or silver or long diamond spires
Hang downward, raining forth a doubtful light;
And there is heard the ever-moving air
Whispering without from tree to tree, and birds
And bees; and all around are mossy seats
And the rough walls are clothed with long soft grass;
A simple dwelling, which shall be our own.
Synesthesia plays some part in the effect of this passage—as in the phrase
"raining forth a doubtful light"—but the emphasis on sensual fulfillment
comes also through the doubling or tripling of pleasure in the description of
each detail. Thus "trailing odorous plants" refresh sight, smell, and feeling;
the floor of veined emerald appeals simultaneously to sight and touch, and so
on. Only taste seems neglected, though the dramatic placing of "And bees"
metonymically calls up honey. Though complex in this fashion, the pleasures
described are also simple. The dazzle of "emerald," "silver," and "diamond"
enriching the dwelling shines out of the natural surroundings. The setting,
including the abundant grass, thus recalls Plato's fantasy of the age of Kronos.
"Where the Split Began"
Shelley must now address the question posed in Politicus: how are those
favored with a life passed in beautiful natural surroundings with all their
physical needs met to use their time? A certain insecurity about the answer
may lie behind Shelley's overdependence on a passage from King Lear as he
Where we will sit and talk of time and change
As the world ebbs and flows, ourselves unchanged—
What can hide man from Mutability?—
And if ye sigh, then I will smile, and thou
lone, shall chant fragments of sea-music,
Until I weep, when ye shall smile away
The tears she brought, which yet were sweet to shed.
For convenience let me set down the haunting lines from King Lear to which
this passage obviously and repeatedly alludes:
No. no, no, no! Come, let's away to prison.
We two alone will sing like birds i' th' cage.
When thou dost ask me blessing, I'll kneel down
And ask of thce forgiveness. So we'll live,
And pray, and sing, and tell old tales, and laugh
At gilded butterflies, and hear poor rogues
Talk of court news; and we'll talk with them too—
Who loses and who wins; who's in, who's out—
And take upon's the mystery of things,
As if we were God's spies; and we'll wear out.
In a wall'd prison, packs and sects of great ones,
That ebb and flow by th' moon.
Return to infant joys is a theme that links both passages. The difficulty is
that the context of Lear's speech sweeps in with his echoed words to trouble
the vision of Prometheus' unchanging happiness at its very inception. Prometheus' plan to "sit and talk of time and change / . . . ourselves unchanged"
echoes Lear's "and we'll wear out, / In a wall'd prison packs and sets of great
ones / That ebb and flow by th' moon," but with heart-aching difference. Lear
and Cordelia are about to experience the final mutability of death. Prometheus' exemption from such change gives an unpleasantly fatuous ring to
"What can hide man from Mutability?" And while the Promethean group's
pleasure in both sighing and smiling over human life's transience has the
doctrines of "sensibility" as its rationale, their exquisitely complex enjoyments seem contemptibly trifling when made so closely parallel to Lear's
desire to reenact the pain of repentance in order to reexperience the joy of
reconciliation. A further difference lies in the dynamics of the infant play
itself. The "we" of Lear's speech—himself and Cordelia—share a condition
of wise childhood, while the "I" and "ye" of Prometheus' fantasy take on
some of the character of an infant with adoring baby-sitters.