Tải bản đầy đủ - 0 (trang)
Putting the concept of 'purchasing power' into perspective

Putting the concept of 'purchasing power' into perspective

Tải bản đầy đủ - 0trang



Statistical argument: construction, uses and controversies ...


at the same time, a complex one to quantify, since the conventions on what counts and on the

way in which it should be counted are problematic.

To sum up on this point, purchasing power is a subject that is both extremely vast and,

in some respects, reductive. It is vast in that it concerns national accounting, the concept and

measurement of the purchasing power of household disposable income and possibly other

national accounting aggregates, and even the distribution of value added107. It is reductive

since this concept implicitly limits purchasing power to its link with market consumption,

which is an important determinant of standard of living but excludes other expenditure

(investment in housing in particular) and the non-market aspects that also help to determine

quality of life, including access to public services.

1.2. Using the retail price index to assess purchasing power: necessary for indexation but

a necessarily imperfect convention

How are we to assess the evolution of purchasing power? One obvious determining

factor is the evolution of disposable income. However, we also need to take into account the

evolution of the prices of the products we wish to acquire, including consumer goods and

market services. Changes in prices are generally presented in the form of indices, which

summarise a number of very diverse changes, with the price of some products rising and

others falling.

In order to illustrate the problematic nature of indices and justify their relevance despite

their inadequacies, here are a few comments taken from a real-life example.

Montpellier airport in the 1990s. A taxi.

'Could you take me to INSEE'S regional office?'

'Ah yes, the liars!'

'I beg your pardon?'

'But yes, at INSEE, they say that prices are stable but my water bill has gone up enormously'.

'Ah I see why you might think that. In fact, when they say that prices are stable, they should

say that some prices have risen, that others have fallen and that, overall, the increases and

decreases cancel each other out. It is the general price index that is stable, not the price of

every product. As far as the price of water is concerned, I don't know what's happened to the

price of water in Montpellier; it's true it's going up in many places. But you need to look

closely at your bill: if it's gone up, it may be because of the price of water but it may also be

that you used more than last year. So then it would be an increase in the volume of water you

used and not just an increase in the price. You would have had a higher water bill, possibly

because of the prices but also because you consumed more. You'd have to see… In any case,

my colleagues at INSEE are not liars: they are asked to summarise a complicated reality in a

simple and usable way; they are told to bring into the public arena a single price index based


These are important economic and social issues, but we will not dwell on them here.


A. Gély et al.

on millions of daily transactions; in any case, if they get it wrong, which can happen, it’s not

with the intention of deceiving us.’

Was the taxi driver convinced? It’s doubtful… But could he be convinced if, for

example, he had the impression he was finding it more and more difficult to make ends meet?

And particularly if the stability of INSEE’s price index was cited as a reason for not raising

his wages or the fares paid by his customers!

However that may be, constructing synthetic price indices, particularly consumer price

indices, is justified by the regulatory power they wield. The political, economic and social

implications of purchasing power are significant, since indexation affects the level and

evolution of the minimum wage and serves, or did serve, as a reference point for the uprating

of wages and other sources of income, such as social security benefits (e.g. pensions), the

RSA108 and even contractual arrangements such as maintenance allowances.

Thus the monitoring of prices and of the way they are evolving is a subject for both

debate and conventions. These conventions change because social relations, politics and

lifestyles themselves also change. Analysis of these conventions shows that questions related

to purchasing power were long based on a double convention. The first was that earnings

should evolve in line with prices. The second was that the evolution of prices should be

measured by the consumer price index (CPI), with all the history and conventions associated

with it.

The retail price index, which measures the change in the price of a basket of goods and

services, has been calculated and published by the French national statistics service since

1913. It was originally a response to the anger of the Parisian working classes, which was

triggered when the prices of basic foodstuffs and rents exploded in 1911. At that time, the

index was calculated only for Paris; it contained just 13 items (including soap and tallow for

candles) and was based on the consumption of manual and white-collar households with two

children. The index was expanded in the interwar period to include about 30 products. The

200 item barrier was crossed after the liberation of France in 1944 and robust consumer

surveys strengthened its representativeness in the 1970s, when the index became national.

This very brief outline of its history should not lead us to believe that the evolution of the

retail price index has been linear and unimpeded. On the contrary, its construction has been

chaotic and subject to pressures from all the parties involved in the indexation of contracts,

principally the state, the employers' associations and the manual workers' trade unions when

the sliding wage scale clause was adopted and constituted the rule for wage setting (between

1952 and the early 1980s). The following are some of the important moments in the

development of this index, and they show quite clearly that its history has been anything but

smooth: the manipulation of the price index at the end of the Fourth Republic, when

governments froze the prices of the public services included in the index and imported

massive quantities of the products included in it; the obligation imposed on INSEE between

1957 and 1962 to calculate and publish a minimum wage index (the so-called 179 item


RSA = revenu de solidarité active, which provides a minimum income for the unemployed and




Statistical argument: construction, uses and controversies ...


index); the dissemination of an alternative index calculated by the CGT in the 1970s and,

more recently, the pressures to exclude tobacco from the index.

2. Origin and emergence of the concept of purchasing power: a constantly debated


When speaking of developments over time, statisticians have long favoured the

expression ‘evolution of earnings in constant francs’ (and now ‘in constant euros’) over the

concept of ‘purchasing power’, preferring to reserve the latter term for comparisons between

different economic and monetary spaces, where price levels are not directly comparable (this

is what is known as ‘purchasing power parity’ or PPP).

In France, this notion of purchasing power does not seem to have established itself (in

these terms) in public debates until fairly recently.

More generally, the more distant past is approached in terms of consumer prices rather

than purchasing power (Touchelay 2013). However, while it is important (and we will return

to it later), the price index is only the denominator of the measure of purchasing power; it is

the numerator that reflects what is most crucial, since it is made up of the resources that

determine purchasing power. Moreover, a price index, by its very nature, can be used to

assess the evolution of purchasing power only, not its level.

Studies from the glory days of the Commissariat Général du Plan (the French State

Planning Commission) scarcely mention this terminology at all. For example, a detailed study

from the early 1970s that made extensive use of ‘social indicators’ does not mention it at all,

and purchasing power was not one of the policy objectives of the economic planning acts.

Other more specialist research centres were no more forthcoming. Thus the CERC (Centre

d'étude des revenus et des coûts), founded in 1966, did not begin systematically to present the

evolution of income in terms of ‘purchasing power’ until the 1980s. CERC disappeared in

1993, after years of only slight changes in purchasing power. Was this just chance? The final

example is INSEE’s flagship publication ‘Données sociales’, first published in 1971: although

‘purchasing power’ was certainly mentioned, it played only a token role that tended to shrink

further with each successive edition before it disappeared totally from the 1990s onwards.

2.1. The price index controversy of the 1970s

One particularly important moment in the development of the price index in France was

the lively debate that went on in the 1970s, when prices were rising particularly sharply, about

the index produced by INSEE; there was even an 'inside' contribution in the form of a

document disseminated by the INSEE branches of the CGT and CFDT trade union

federations entitled: 'Is the price index rigged?'109. These trade unions emphasised, quite

rightly, the importance of what is known as the 'quality effect': to what extent can a possible


Paper archives: the report by the INSEE trade unions entitled: L'indice des prix est-il truqué/Is the price index

rigged? (20 pages + annexes, Paris, February 1974); a report by the association DIES Pouvoir d'achat : du

mauvais usage des statistiques/Purchasing power: on the misuse of statistics 16 pages, October 1980; references

compiled by B. Touchelay.


A. Gély et al.

improvement in product quality be considered as a reduction in price? The INSEE trade

unions went so far as to call for the index not to be published. One would have expected to

find the expression 'purchasing power' in this document, particularly because the use of the

price index as a reference point in legal processes such as the indexation of contracts or court

decisions on such matters as maintenance allowances or in wage negotiations was not exactly

unknown to the document's authors. However, it is entirely absent from the document.

The controversy quickly extended beyond the confines of INSEE and the technical

departments most involved and was taken up by the trade union confederations. Thus the

CGT started collecting its own price data, from which it calculated its own index. The trade

union used this alternative indicator, which incidentally was more an expenditure index than a

price index, as an ad hoc 'statistical argument' in pay negotiations and as a basis for

demanding an increase in the national minimum wage. The CFDT favoured an approach

based on typical budgets, which the three main trade union confederations calculated from the

end of the Second World War onwards up until the 1970s. By calculating 'typical budgets', the

CFDT sought to show that workers could not live decently with earnings below the uprated

minimum wage for which they were calling.

These debates, which raged during the 1970s, tended to disappear from the public space

during the 1980s and 90s, for several reasons. Among them, the following are particularly

notable: disinflation (the annual rate of inflation in the French economy fell from more than

10% in the 1970s to about 2% in the 2000s); the de-indexation of wages in 1983; the fact that

the producers of the 'INSEE index' had to some extent taken account of the criticisms levelled

at it in the 1970s; the cost to the CGT of compiling its own index (collection of price data,

statistical analysis of the data, etc.) and the fact that in some months the CGT index increased

less rapidly than the INSEE index …

In the end, activists and the trade union confederations gradually stopped using the

alternative indices in wage negotiations. However, these debates were far from concluded.

2.2. The adoption of a 'tobacco-free' index in the 1990s

One important event, which is significant in more ways than one, took place in 1990.

This was the adoption as an instrument of indexation of a consumer price index (CPI) that

excluded tobacco. This political decision arose officially out of a concern with public health:

increasing the taxes on tobacco could both increase the state's revenues and reduce the

consumption of tobacco, whose harmful effects on health were well known. However, such an

increase was going to push the price index up and give rise to demands for wage increases in

order to maintain purchasing power. This is why it was decided to exclude tobacco from the

index. However, the statisticians declared that consumption should not be assessed morally

but objectively and pointed to the international definitions of consumption that France had

accepted; their arguments were strong enough for them to obtain agreement on continuing to

calculate and publish the full price index, including tobacco. Nevertheless, the legislature

made it compulsory to use a CPI that excluded tobacco for the purposes of indexation. This

regulation is still in force today.

Tài liệu bạn tìm kiếm đã sẵn sàng tải về

Putting the concept of 'purchasing power' into perspective

Tải bản đầy đủ ngay(0 tr)