Tải bản đầy đủ - 0trang
4…The Structure of the Atom
P. Douglas et al.
this very small volume by the strong nuclear force. This is a very strong, but short
range (ca. fm range), attractive force between proton–proton, proton–neutron, and
neutron–neutron, which is independent of electric charge. As the atomic number
increases, charge repulsion between protons increases also, and the number of
neutrons required for a stable nucleus, in which the strong force between all
particles is greater than the electrostatic repulsion between protons, increases.
Thus, the neutron to proton ratio for the elements increases rapidly with Z. But this
nucleus stabilisation by neutrons is limited in effect, and above an atomic number
of 83 (Bi) all nuclides are unstable to radioactive decay (209Bi, Z = 83, is the
heaviest stable nucleus).
The way the spins of the protons and neutrons in the nucleus combine can lead to
nuclei with spin quantum numbers (I), varying from 0 to 6, and isotopes of the same
element can have, and usually do have, different spin quantum numbers. Isotopic
nuclear spin is important in NMR. For example, 12C has I = 0 and 13C has I = ,
so that NMR spectroscopy is not possible with 12C nuclei but is possible with 13C.
Fortunately for chemists the natural carbon isotopes include *1 % 13C, and 13C
NMR is a very important tool in chemical structure elucidation . Nuclear spin
can also have subtle effects in other spectroscopies , and nuclear mass is
important in molecular vibrational and rotational spectroscopies.
There is an electrostatic force of attraction between electrons and the nucleus
and for atoms with more than one electron, there is also electrostatic repulsion
between electrons. Since the electron mass is much smaller than that of the
nucleus, the centre of mass of an electron-nucleus system lies much more closely
to the nucleus than the electron. The force of attraction between a nucleus and
electron acts on both bodies equally, and since F = ma, the electron is accelerated
much more by this attraction than the nucleus. This gives us a simple atomic
model: a very small, yet relatively massive, slow moving positively-charged
nucleus around which there are relatively light, rapidly moving, negativelycharged electrons, all held together by electrostatic forces. These electrostatic
forces, nucleus–electron and electron–electron, control the momentum, and also,
through the de Broglie relationship, the wavelength of an electron as it moves
around the nucleus. So between them, the nature of the electrostatic force and the
mass of the electron determine the shapes of the stable electron waves in atoms.
1.4.2 Electron Waves in Atoms: Atomic Orbitals
126.96.36.199 Electron Waves
The physical boundaries of a musical instrument, the length of a string or column
of air, or the area of a drum, restrict the possible shapes and frequencies, and hence
energies, of the sound waves the instrument can produce. In a similar way the
‘boundaries’ of a molecule created by the electrostatic forces between electrons
1 Foundations of Photochemistry
and nuclei restrict the shapes and energies of the electron waves within the molecule. In a musical instrument the different wave shapes and energies give rise to
the fixed frequencies of the fundamental and overtones generated by the instrument. In chemical structures, the restriction of possible wave shapes and energies
controls the behaviour of electrons, and hence chemical properties. The mathematics for an electron in a chemical structure is more complex than a wave on a
string or in a column of air, but the principle is the same; the combination of
constraints and boundary conditions, naturally limits the properties of the electron
waves in atoms and molecules to discrete, fixed, ‘quantised’, values. The shapes of
the waves are limited, and the important properties of: electron wave energy,
absolute electron wave orbital angular momentum, and orientation of the electron
wave orbital angular momentum, are also naturally quantised.
The answer to the question of what stable electron waves are allowed in any
chemical structure is given by the time-independent Schrödinger wave equation
for that structure. (The time-independent wave equation is used to obtain the stable
electron waves around atoms and other chemical structures, and the time-dependent wave equation is used for calculations of electron waves as they undergo
‘transitions’ from one wave into another). The Schrödinger equation is not
derivable directly from any previous equations; it combines ideas of wave and
particle behaviour that were previously considered mutually exclusive. This
combination of particle and wave properties can be illustrated by discussion of the
equation for the hydrogen atom.
188.8.131.52 The Hydrogen Atom
The particles. The hydrogen atom is made up of only two particles, the proton and
electron. The mathematics of the relative movement of two particles is such that
we can reduce the problem to only one moving particle of reduced mass moving
around the centre of gravity of the pair. Because of the difference in masses of the
proton and electron, it is convenient to identify the electron as the moving particle
(with the reduced mass, le, given by le = (memn)/(me ? mn), where me and mn are
the mass of an electron and the nucleus, respectively). The difference in mass and
reduced mass of the electron is less than 0.1 %, and the centre of gravity of the
atom lies very close to the centre of the proton, so that, for all but detailed
calculations, we can keep the simple model of an electron moving around a proton.
The energy of the negatively charged electron moving around the positivelycharged proton is made up of two parts: (1) the potential energy, which is the
electrostatic energy of the electron associated with its position with regard to the
nucleus, PE; and (2) the kinetic energy, KE, due to its velocity, The sum of the two
is the total energy of the system, i.e. Etotal = PE ? mV2. As the electron moves
about the nucleus there is a constant interchange between these two types of
energy: the potential energy is greatest when the electron is furthest from the
nucleus and is moving slowly, and the kinetic energy is greatest when the electron
P. Douglas et al.
is moving rapidly, close to the nucleus. Conservation of energy requires their sum,
the total energy, to be constant.
The waves. The wave equations for two charged particles moving with respect
to one another can be obtained exactly. In Schrödinger’s equation the wavelength
of the electron at any point and time is given by its momentum (p = mv) using the
de Broglie equation k = h/p. The electron is constantly changing velocity as it
moves around the proton so the wavelength of the electron wave varies as it
moves. Only some electron waves will ‘fit’ and be stable to interference as they
oscillate. The energy of the electron wave, i.e. the sum of the potential and kinetic
energy, is equated with the frequency of the oscillation of the wave by E = hm.
The mathematics of the Schrödinger wave equation determines which electron
energies give waves that are stable to destructive interference. It also gives the
shapes and angular momenta of the waves. As for all waves that are constrained in
space, only certain waves are stable, only certain electron waves can fit within the
atom and these waves have fixed energies. The electron can only have one of these
fixed energies and no other; the electron energy is quantised, The electron energy
is not continuously variable unless the electron escapes from the constraints of the
atom itself, i.e. it is ionised and becomes a free moving electron.
Just as there are a number of waves which will fit on the string of a musical
instrument—the fundamental and the overtones, there are a number of solutions to
the Schrödinger wave equation for an atom, each one a different electron wave
shape with a different energy. Each solution is called a wavefunction, given the
symbol W. The wavefunction gives the amplitude of the electron wave as a
function of the position of the electron around the nucleus when in that electron
wave. (The wavefunction for a wave on a string gives the amplitude of the displacement of the string, as a function of position on the string as in Fig. 1.5). The
amplitude can be positive or negative, i.e. the sign of the wavefunction can vary in
different regions of the wave. This property of sign or phase is critically important
when electron waves overlap in space. If both waves have the same sign then the
waves interfere constructively in that region of space, when the waves are of
opposite sign they interfere destructively. It is this wave interference that is
responsible for the formation of chemical bonds between atoms.
In atoms, these three dimensional electron waves are referred to as atomic
orbitals (AO’s); in molecules, they are molecular orbitals (MO’s). In hydrogen,
the solutions of the Schrödinger equation give a series of orbitals, which are
characterised by three properties, each with an associated quantum number:
1. Energy (quantum number n).
2. Orbital angular momentum (quantum number l). Like orbital energy this is
quantised and can only take fixed values. The orbital angular momentum
controls the shape and symmetry of the wave.
3. Orientation of the orbital angular momentum (quantum number ml). The orientation of the waves is limited to those in which the angular momentum along
any chosen axis is quantised in integral units.
1 Foundations of Photochemistry
n is the principal quantum number and can only take integral values 1, 2, 3, …
etc. For a single electron atom, such as hydrogen, it defines the energy of the wave;
as n increases, the energy of the wave increases and the wave moves further away
from the nucleus. The value of n determines the total number of nodal surfaces
(surfaces where the amplitude of the wave function is zero, and across which the
wave function changes sign) in the wave; the number of such surfaces is given by
n-1 (see also Fig. 1.5 where the number of nodes is also given by n-1). The value
of n also controls the possible values that the total orbital angular momentum
quantum number, l, can take. All orbitals of the same n make up the n shell.
The orbital angular momentum quantum number, l, defines the total angular
momentum of the orbital. l defines the shape (symmetry) of the wave. As n increases
the orbitals can have more angular momentum, i.e. the greater the value of n, the
more shapes are available (Fig. 1.6). l can take values of l = 1, 2, 3…(n-1). Atomic
Fig. 1.6 Parity and the effect of inversion on the sign of the wavefunctions for some s, p, d and
P. Douglas et al.
orbitals are usually described by a letter associated with each l value. When l = 0 the
orbital is an s orbital, when l = 1 it is a p orbital, when l = 2 is it a d orbital, and when
l = 3 it is an f orbital (these letters arise from spectroscopic studies of emission lines
which were classified as: sharp (s), principal (p), diffuse (d), and fundamental (f)).
Orbitals with l [ 3 (g orbitals etc.) are not important in general chemistry or photochemistry, but are very important in atoms excited close to their dissociation limit,
so-called Rydberg atoms.
The angular momentum of each orbital is given by:
orbital angular momentum ẳ ẵll ỵ 1Þ1=2 Áh=2p:
l determines the number of nodal planes which go through the nucleus. If l = 0
or is even (2, 4…), then the orbitals are symmetric with respect to inversion
through the nucleus, i.e. the sign of the wavefunction at any point is the same at the
corresponding point across the nucleus. For l = odd number (1, 3…), the orbitals
are anti-symmetric with respect to inversion, i.e. the sign of the wavefunction
changes across the nucleus. This is of particular relevance when the molecules
have a centre of symmetry and these properties are sometimes described as parity;
the orbitals which are symmetric by inversion have even (symmetric) parity, while
those which are asymmetric have odd (anti-symmetric) parity. The German terms
gerade, g, (even) and ungerade, u, (odd) are also commonly used. Figure 1.6
shows the parity of some s, p, d and f orbitals in a centrosymmetric system.
The orbital magnetic quantum number, ml, specifies the orientation of the orbital
in space and the magnitude of the orbital angular momentum component along any
specified axis. Orbitals with the same n and l, but different ml, are all equal in energy
in the absence of a magnetic field, (orbitals of the same energy are described as
degenerate), but, because their magnetic moments point in different directions, they
align with slightly different energies in the presence of an applied magnetic field.
The values of ml are limited by the value of l to: ml = l, (l-1), …, -l.
The orbital description of the electron can then be given as either a series of the
three quantum numbers, n, l, ml, or, more usually, the principal quantum number,
n, followed by the letter corresponding to the angular momentum quantum number, l, i.e. s, p, d or f. Grouped by principal quantum number, the atomic orbitals
for the first four n shells are:
1sn ẳ 1; l ẳ 0ị;
2sn ẳ 2; l ẳ 0ị; 2pn ẳ 2; l ẳ 1ị;
3sn ẳ 3; l ¼ 0Þ; 3pðn ¼ 3; l ¼ 1Þ; 3dðn ¼ 3; l ẳ 2ị;
4sn ẳ 4; l ẳ 0ị; 4pn ¼ 4; l ¼ 1Þ; 4dðn ¼ 4; l ¼ 2ị; 4f n ẳ 4; l ẳ 3ị:
While the electron wavefunction can be used to obtain the energy and other
properties of the electron, the question arises, in quantum mechanics generally, as
to what the wavefunction itself ‘‘means’’. This has been, and still is, the subject of
much debate and there is currently intense research activity into using attosecond
spectroscopy to probe atomic wavefunctions . The most useful interpretation
of the wavefunction for chemistry is that due to Born, who, by analogy to a light
wave, where the intensity is proportional to the square of the amplitude, suggested
1 Foundations of Photochemistry
Fig. 1.7 Three-dimensional shapes of the s, p and d atomic orbitals for the hydrogen atom. The
‘‘+’’ and ‘‘-’’ signs represent the sign of the electron wavefunction in that region of space
that the square of the amplitude of the wavefunction in a small volume of space
gives the probability of finding the electron there. Thus, the square of the wavefunction can be used to calculate electron density maps and surfaces.
Figure 1.7 summarises the atomic orbitals for the hydrogen atom, and shows
their three dimensional shape using the usual chemist’s representation where the
outer surface is all at the same electron density, i.e. they are isoelectronic density
plots, such that the probability of finding the electron in the volume drawn is some
fixed value—usually 95 or 90 %. The orbitals are often marked with the sign of the
wavefunction in that region of space (not to be confused with ionic charges), or
regions of different sign are shown in two different colours.
The lines in the emission and absorption spectra of the atoms correspond to the
electronic transitions as electrons move from one orbital to another. The energy of
the photon emitted, or absorbed, corresponds to the difference in energies of the
electron in the two orbitals involved. The yellow/orange glow of sodium lamps or
street lights corresponds to the photons emitted as excited sodium atoms with the
outermost electron in the 4p orbital fall down to the ground atomic state in which it
is in the 3s orbital.
The Schrödinger equation (more precisely the refined version incorporating both
relativity and quantum electrodynamics), and those obtained from it, describe the
physical and chemical features of the hydrogen atom with an accuracy limited only
by the precision to which the fundamental constants required are known. Unfortunately, the hydrogen atom is the only chemical structure for which the Schrödinger
equation can be solved exactly; everything else requires approximation. For small
atoms and very small molecules the approximations can be very good, but for any
P. Douglas et al.
structure of much complexity, and that means most interesting structures, they are
not good enough to allow the calculation of many important chemical properties to a
useful level of accuracy. Because of this, chemistry and photochemistry remain
essentially experimental subjects. Theory is, however, invaluable in our understanding of the underlying phenomena.
184.108.40.206 Multi-Electron Atoms
For multi-electron atoms the Schrödinger equation cannot be solved analytically,
so methods involving approximations, of varying degrees of sophistication, are
used instead. The first approximation is that the wave equation for the whole
system is made up of individual wave equations for each electron, and each
electron is in an orbital of a form modelled on those of the hydrogen atom. For
purposes of calculation and modelling, sophisticated approximations such as Slater
orbitals or Gaussian orbitals are used. However, because orbital symmetry is often
of paramount importance when combining orbitals to give molecular structures,
the simple orbital shapes and symmetries given in Fig. 1.7 provide an excellent
basis for the understanding and visualisation of chemical bonding and chemical
structures. Also, usually we are only concerned with the electrons in the highest
energy, outer, or valence, orbitals of an atom. Electrons in lower energy orbitals,
the core orbitals, are held closely to the nucleus and are not generally involved in
chemical or photochemical transformations.
The first question for multi-electron atoms is: ‘‘how are the electrons placed in
the orbitals of different energies?’’ In the absence of any other information, we
might expect that in the state of lowest energy all of the electrons in the atom
would be in the lowest orbital, although we would also be aware that putting
electrons together in the same region of space will result in some increase in
overall energy due to electrostatic repulsion.
However, we have not yet incorporated electron spin into our atomic model.
The alignment of the electron spin angular momentum along any axis can only be
such to give a resultant spin angular momentum along the axis of either = ? "h
h. We can describe which of these two spin states an electron adopts using
the additional quantum number, ms, which can take values of + or -. Thus, the
complete description of the electron in an atom requires four quantum numbers: n,
l, ml, and ms. It is a general property of electrons (and all fermions), expressed in
the Pauli Exclusion Principle, that no two can have the same four quantum
numbers, Thus, it is possible to place two, but only two, electrons in the same n, l,
ml state and when they are so placed they must have electron spins arranged in
opposing directions, i.e. one with ms = ? and one with ms = -. If we use an
arrow to indicate the electron spin direction, up or down, when two electrons are in
the same orbital the electron spins are arranged thus, :;.
So the first two electrons can go into the 1s orbital, but with two electrons the
orbital is full and the next electron must go into the next highest orbital, the
1 Foundations of Photochemistry
2s. Putting electrons together in the same orbital raises the energy of both electrons
due to electron–electron repulsion, the total increase in energy this causes is called
the electron pairing energy. Therefore, when filling orbitals of equal energy, i.e.
degenerate orbitals, such as the three p orbitals, the electrons go into the individual
orbitals singly at first (Hund’s rule). Also, for two different singly occupied orbitals
the arrangement in which the two electron spins are parallel, ::, is lower in energy
than that in which they are opposed, :;, because in the parallel spin arrangement the
electrons tend to spend more time apart in space. So when electrons go singly into
different orbitals the arrangement with spins parallel is lower in energy than that with
spins opposed. The magnitude of the separation between these spin opposed and
spin-paired energy states (sometimes referred to as the exchange energy integral) is
determined by the spatial overlap of the two orbitals, i.e. how likely the two electrons
are to occupy the same region of space. If the orbitals have little overlap in space this
energy difference is small. We will see later how the same ideas apply to molecules
and are important in their excited state behaviour.
The arrangement of electrons is thus governed by four factors: the energy of the
orbitals, an orbital occupancy of at most two electrons spin paired per orbital, the
magnitude of the electron–electron repulsion spin pairing energy, and the direction
of the spin angular momenta of the electrons. Using these ideas, and a few
refinements in the relative energy of s, p, d and f orbitals in many electron-atoms,
the electronic structure of all atoms can be understood .
220.127.116.11 Size of Atoms and Molecules Compared to Wavelength of Light
Atoms are not hard incompressible spheres and so the definition of their size is
somewhat arbitrary. A variety of atomic sizes can be measured from intermolecular distances, or liquid or solid volumes, and can also be calculated from the
Schrödinger equation. In the lowest electronic state, atomic diameters are of the
order of one hundred to a few hundred pm. The Schrödinger equation shows, that
for the H atom, the orbital radii increase in proportion to n2, so if an electron is
promoted into a higher energy orbital the size of the electronically excited atom
will be significantly larger than the ground state. (In terms of our analogy of waves
in boxes, the atomic energy levels corresponding to different principal quantum
number n, are not so much the different energy levels arising from waves in a box
of fixed size, which would increase in energy separation as n increases as shown in
Fig. 1.5, but rather the different energy levels corresponding to waves in boxes of
different size which decrease in energy separation as the box size increases.) The
importance of atomic/molecular size for the interaction between UV/Vis photons
and chemical species is that, since the wavelength of UV/Vis radiation is one
thousand times larger than an atomic diameter then, even for a large or excitedstate atom, or molecule, the wavelength of a UV/Vis photon is big enough that the
electromagnetic field of the photon acts on all electrons and nuclei in the atom/
molecule with, to a very good approximation, the same phase. (Although the fact
P. Douglas et al.
that the electromagnetic phase is not exactly the same across an atom or molecule
is one reason why nominally forbidden transitions (see Sect. 1.12.1) are allowed to
1.4.3 Description of Atomic Electronic States: Term
Symbols, Spin Multiplicity, Angular Momenta, Spin
Orbit Coupling and the Heavy Atom Effect
Depending upon the precise electronic arrangement, the various combinations of
electron spin and orbital angular moment can lead to atomic energy levels of
different spin, orbital and total angular momenta. Term symbols are a useful
shorthand representation of the angular momenta of these individual atomic states.
The values which need to be represented are: the total electron spin angular
momentum, described by the quantum number S; the total orbital angular
momentum, described by the quantum number L; and the total angular momentum
resulting from the combination of L and S, described by the quantum number J.
The term symbol gives these three angular momenta in the following form:
corresponding letter for Li:e: S; P; D; FịJvalue;or values
using upright font for the letter to help distinguish it from the italic quantum
The first superscript does not give S directly but rather the spin multiplicity, the
number of possible values of electron spin momentum along a specific axis, which
is 2S ? 1. Thus if S = 0, (all electrons spin paired), there is only one arrangement;
the total spin is zero and therefore also zero along the axis, and the state is called a
singlet. For S = (one unpaired electron), there are two arrangements, the total
spin is [( ? 1)]1/2"
h and this can point up or down the axis to give values +"h
and -"h along the axis, and the state is a doublet. For S = 1 (two unpaired
electrons), there are three arrangements, the total spin is [1(1 ? 1)]1/2"h and this
can point up, to give spin +1"
h along the axis, point down to give -1"h, or point at
h along the axis (i.e. at 908 to the axis), and the state is a triplet. A schematic
diagram showing the formation of singlet and triplet states from the spin momenta
of two electrons is shown in Fig. 1.8.
As a simple example, an atom with only one unpaired electron, consider a
ground state sodium atom (11 electrons). This has a full n = 1 shell, a full n = 2
shell and the single outermost electron in a n = 3 s-orbital, i.e. l = 0. The full
shells have zero spin and angular momenta and therefore do not contribute to the
term symbol, which, since S = 1/2 and L = 0, is 2S1/2 (read as: doublet S one half).
If the electron is excited into an n = 3 p-orbital, then since S = 1/2, L = 1 the spin
and angular momenta can reinforce or oppose each other giving J = 3/2 or 1/2 to
give two term symbols 2P3/2 and 2P1/2 (read as: doublet P three halves, doublet P
one half); see Fig. 1.8 for a diagram of this case). These two levels with J = 3/2
1 Foundations of Photochemistry
Fig. 1.8 Combining spin–spin, and spin-orbital, angular momenta. a The resultant total electron
spin angular momentum and spin orientations arising from the combination of electron spin from
two electrons, each s = 1/2, which gives a singlet (S = 0, i.e. no resultant spin) and a triplet state
(S = 1). The triplet state is triply degenerate because the spin angular momentum vector can
point so as to have three values along the z-axis. b The resultant total angular momentum and
orientations from the combination of the spin of one electron, s = 1/2, and orbital angular
momentum from a p orbital (l = 1) which gives rise to J = 1/2 and J = 3/2
P. Douglas et al.
and J = 1/2 differ slightly in energy, and close examination of the yellow/orange
line at 589 nm produced by sodium atoms in a flame, or a sodium street lamp,
shows that it is in fact made up of two lines very close together, one at 589.76 nm
and one at 589.16 nm, corresponding to the transition from the two 2P3/2,1/2 levels
to the single 2S1/2 ground state.
Consider now a magnesium atom (12 electrons). In the ground state it has a full
n = 1 shell, a full n = 2 shell and the two ‘outermost electrons’ are in an n = 3 sorbital, i.e. l = 0. By the Pauli exclusion principle, the two electrons in the n = 3 sorbital must be spin paired and so S = 0, L = 0 and the term symbol is 1S0 (read:
singlet S nought). The atom can be excited by promoting one of the n = 3 selectrons to an n = 3 p-orbital, for which l = 1. There are now two electrons in
different orbitals and these are not restricted by the Pauli exclusion principle. If they
are spin paired S = 0, L = 1 and the term symbol is 1P1, (singlet P one) if they are
not spin paired but spin parallel, then S = 1, L = 1, and the term symbols are 3P2
(triplet P two), 3P1 (triplet P one), and 3P0 (triplet P nought). The triplet states are of
lower energy than the singlet due to the spin-pairing energy of the singlet.
Most molecules have a ground state with electrons paired, i.e. a singlet ground
state, and just like the Mg atom, promotion of an electron to a higher orbital leads
to two possible spin states, i.e. singlet and triplet states. For virtually all organic
systems and many (but far from all) inorganic ones, the singlet and triplet spin
states are the only ones which are relevant for photochemical processes. Note that
the three levels of a triplet state are degenerate (i.e. they have the same energy)
under normal conditions, but have different energies in a magnetic field. We can
obtain information on the properties of triplet states by studying them in a magnetic field (magnetic field effects).
In general, spin- and orbital- angular momenta for atoms can be combined in
one of two ways, depending upon the strength of coupling between the spin and
orbital angular momenta for the electrons in the atom. Where the coupling between
spin and orbital momenta is weak (the most important case) Russell–Saunders
coupling is used. Due to weak coupling, spin and orbital angular momenta are first
of all treated separately, i.e. all the electron spin momenta are combined together
to give S, all the orbital angular momenta are combined to give L and these are
then combined to give J. Strong coupling between spin and orbital momenta, gives
jj coupling, in which the individual electron spin and orbital angular momenta
combine first, to give an electron overall angular momentum, j, for each electron,
and these j momenta combine to give the total overall angular momentum of the
atom, J. The strength of spin–orbit coupling increases rapidly with atomic number,
depending as it does on Zn, (where n C 4); thus Russell–Saunders coupling is
found for light and moderate Z atoms, while jj coupling is found for the heavier
atoms of the Periodic Table. A strong spin-orbit coupling is evident in the relatively easy interchange of spin angular momenta and orbital angular momenta,
known as the heavy atom effect. The heavy atom effect mixes electron spin and
electron orbital angular momenta. For atoms, and molecules composed of atoms,
which have weak spin orbit coupling, i.e. those of low or medium atomic number,
electron spin angular momenta and orbital momenta can be considered distinct and